DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23901>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23901 [PATCH] [woody], adding <wd:on-phase> and moving load() and save() to Form. ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-10-18 11:03 ------- You're introducing here non-widget elements as child of the wd:form element. This makes me think that now might be a good time to introduce a wd:children element as child of the wd:form element, in which all child widgets would be wrapped, something like: <wd:form> <wd:on-phase ... /> <wd:children> <wd:field ... /> ... </wd:children> </wd:form> This enables us to distinguish widgets from other configuration elements, so that we can keep the strong checking. I'd do the same also for the children of the wd:repeater. -==- Then something else: please try to leave out stuff like this in your diffs: - formDefinition.setId(""); - setLabel(formElement, formDefinition); + formDefinition.setId( "" ); + setLabel( formElement, formDefinition ); it makes the diffs harder to read, and it doesn't follow the style of the rest of the Cocoon code anyway.
