--- Marc Portier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Sylvain Wallez wrote: > > And also, considering the very unique features of the Form class > > compared to other widgets, I'm wondering if it should be a widget at all. > > binding itself benefits from the implied 'composite' pattern this > approach is introducing > > care to share more practical reasons to change it? > > (pls understand: I'm open to changing it, but if we do, I would like us > to keep the composite pattern allive by introducing some > wrapping/wrapped widget that holds all the widgets of the form?)
I have written a "Struct" widget that would fill this need for a composite pattern, but I do not yet have an opinion on the question of whether the form should be a widget or not. Expect a patch set pretty soon for "Struct", "Union", "Class", and "New" widgets. --Tim Larson __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? The New Yahoo! Shopping - with improved product search http://shopping.yahoo.com
