Can anyone please give me short hint/pointer why we have so two classes that look very identical?
FOM_JavaScriptInterpreter is the one that implements the FOM (Flow Object Model), and the only one that should actually be used.
A good thing would be to remove the current JavaScriptInterpreter and replace it by the FOM_JavaScriptIntepreter. But I fear that is will break many applications that rely on the FOM_Cocoon object.
We should have better designed this with interfaces...
Sylvain
-- Sylvain Wallez Anyware Technologies http://www.apache.org/~sylvain http://www.anyware-tech.com { XML, Java, Cocoon, OpenSource }*{ Training, Consulting, Projects } Orixo, the opensource XML business alliance - http://www.orixo.com
