What's the status here, do we want to change it? Carsten
> -----Original Message----- > From: Vadim Gritsenko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2003 12:39 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [BUG] CachingPointProcessingPipeline is Configurable and > Parameterizable > > > Carsten Ziegeler wrote: > > >>-----Original Message----- > >>From: Michael Melhem [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2003 2:59 PM > >>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>Subject: Re: [BUG] CachingPointProcessingPipeline is Configurable and > >>Parameterizable > >> > >> > >>On Mon, Oct 27, 2003 at 09:37:34AM +0100, Carsten Ziegeler wrote: > >> > >> > >>>The CachingPointProcessingPipeline is Configurable and Parameterizable > >>>which is afaik not allowed. I think, this was checked in an earlier > >>>version of ECM but seems to be not checkec anymore. > >>> > >>>As the base class of the processing pipeline is Parameterizable and > >>>all other pipeline implementations use this interface, it seems > >>>that Parameterizable is the way to go. > >>> > >>>What do you think? > >>> > >>> > >>OK lets stick with parameterizable then. :) I could make that > >>change. Is this a > >>problem in both the 2.1 and 2.2 branches ? > >> > >> > >> > >Yepp, both are "infected" :) > > > >I'm +1 for the changes, but they are incompatible, so we should add > >somewhere (where users find it) some notes about it. > > > > > > status.xml, in <changes/> section? > > Vadim > >
