Stefano Mazzocchi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 7 Nov 2003, at 18:30, Tomasz Nowak wrote: > > > Vadim Gritsenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > But it might not worth the trouble adding all this complexity > > > just to implement some debug feature > > > > Well, it obviously is a debug feature. But you probably > > might want to look at it as a small, discreet marketing > > feature also. I suppose some IT-oriented people view > > the page source to see the quality of html code > > or to find out "how" was the page construted/generated. > > And don't forget the show-time feature prints not only > > the processing time, but also the Apache Cocoon mark. > > > > (<!-- Processed by Apache Cocoon 2.2... -->) > > > > That's a common practice used in many frameworks/producs > > ex Vignette products etc. > > FYI, cocoon already outputs a "X-cocoon:" HTTP header that "markets" > our presence in every request it handles. So, if we really want to > know if cocoon handles that resource look at the HTTP headers, they > don't break content length and are much more "REST"-ish.
I know about header add of course, but as I suppose amout of people that can lookup HTTP headers is just vestigal in comparison to amount of people that are able to lookup the HTML source. That's just my 2 cents. -- Tomasz Nowak
