Sylvain Wallez dijo: > So since we _need_ to be able to specify URLs relative to the current > sitemap, what do you suggest? A subprotocol like what we have for > "cocoon:raw", another protocol like "current-sitemap:"? > > Just like Bruno, I'm happy with the "cocoon:/" and "cocoon://" we have > today. Moreover, I have not seen any of the people to which I explained > this behaviour complaining about URL syntax abuse. > > Also, I'm not following cocoon-users closely enough, but does this Q&A > you describe above come often about the "cocoon:" protocol?
The answer is simple: With good documentation nobody will be losed. :-D Best Regards, Antonio Gallardo
