On 13 Nov 2003, at 14:49, Berin Loritsch wrote:
Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
Sigh. I'm not going to force you guys not to make the same mistake again.and break all sitemaps out there?
It seems I am the only one who doesn't like it, even though I strongly
encourage at least stripping out *one* of the forward slashes so that a
relative URI has no forward slashes at the beginning at all.
As far as I know this was all about adding new semantics to the "context:" protocol--so I wanted to encourage everyone not to do it in the same way as the "cocoon:" protocol. So no, not break all sitemaps out there.
Ah, ok. Lost the context, sorry.
But wouldn't it be even *more* confusing to have two different ways to handle with protocols?
-- Stefano.
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
