From: Vadim Gritsenko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Geoff Howard wrote:
Bruno Dumon wrote:some time,
Tim has been hanging around on our mailing lists for quite
code. Becomingand is actively contributing, both in discussions and
+1, especially if we see advancements on multiforms! :)a committer can only motivate him to keep up the good work.+1 - welcome!
+1 from me.
CocoonForms are nearly on the top of my Cocoon-ToDo-list ;-)
I expect starting with them in december. If somebody needs it earlier and wants to start with its implementation pls let us/me ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) know in order to avoid duplicate efforts!
If somebody wants to help me with this task or needs a starting point have a look at this thread: http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?t=106672365000004&r=1&w=2
I like Sylvain's idea of the separate "wizard-layer" and will try to use Christopher's hints how to implement it.
No, I'm not interested in continuations management with forms ATM. What I was referring to was "Subform thoughts" [1] by Tim Larson. According to it, secure multiforms (or subforms) can be done with new "union" widget, and then form POST processing and validation will happen only on part of the form identified by the union, which will allow for one form definition, and may be one binding, and may be one template file, and this will cut down a lot on the amount of required files.
Vadim
[1] http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=xml-cocoon-dev&m=106965619705596&w=2
