see http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=xml-cocoon-dev&w=2&r=1&s=recyclable+rese ttable&q=b (especially Berin's comments)
Cheers, Reinhard > -----Original Message----- > From: Geoff Howard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, December 05, 2003 1:19 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Compatibility Issues with 2.2 > > > Carsten Ziegeler wrote: > > So, is anyone against reverting back to Recyclable? > > If not, I will do it in the next days. > > I thought there was a deeper difference than semantic but > assumed that someone (Berin?) would pipe in and explain. > > If you've looked into it carefully and think that's it, I > agree with you. > > Geoff > > > > >>-----Original Message----- > >>From: Vadim Gritsenko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2003 3:32 PM > >>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>Subject: Re: Compatibility Issues with 2.2 > >> > >> > >>Carsten Ziegeler wrote: > >> > >> > >>>Vadim Gritsenko wrote: > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>>>I've got couple of questions... > >>>>(1) Was Recyclable deprecated or not? > >>>> > >>>> > >>> > >>>afaik, no. > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>>>(2) Can we implement both? > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>> > >>>This could be a dangerous road, I think. What should happen if a > >>>component implements both? > >>> > >>> > >> > >>You are asking me??? Ask the guys who invented Resettable! :) > >> > >>Vadim > >> > >> > > > > > > > > >
