Vadim Gritsenko wrote:
Marc Portier wrote:
Vadim Gritsenko wrote:
Marc Portier wrote:
<snip topic="use cases on introducing some direction control on all bindings" />
my proposal was to add some @direction="load|save|both"
Good examples. But I'm not sure I like "direction" attribute. Can we just add "writeonly" attribute, in addition to "readonly"?
Vadim
Vadim,
I started refactoring the bindings for this, but still have to decide how the builder will retrieve the settings from the binding-declaration file
After considering your proposal I'm pretty much at the position of siwtching back to my original proposal. There are two cases introduced by the @readonly @writeonly couple that make it odd IMHO
1/ readonly="true" writeonly="true"
kinda fights with the meaning of 'only' as a suffix
2/ readonly="false" writeonly="false"
which would be the equivalent of direction="none" :-)
for fast testing without a binding I would recommend to people that they just comment out that section :-)
-marc= -- Marc Portier http://outerthought.org/ Outerthought - Open Source, Java & XML Competence Support Center Read my weblog at http://blogs.cocoondev.org/mpo/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
