Vadim Gritsenko wrote: > Sylvain Wallez wrote: <snip/> > > > > Was there a discussion about this that I missed, and if not, > > what do you think of using "-dev-yyyymmdd.jar" names? > > -1 to "-dev", +1 to "whatever-yyymmdd", whatever may include > dev for those who want it.
I agree entirely. In fact this has always been our stance. It is surprising that some committers are ignoring the warnings about this from the "validate-jars" build task. Perhaps we should go one step further and make the build break if the jar names contravene the convention. It may sound draconian, but it seems the only way. --David
