Upayavira wrote: > Marc Portier wrote: >> now, in this case backendX is cocoon (modifiable) sources, so I would >> guess some saveToSource/loadFromSource can be made quite generic and >> might very well be candidates for natural extension of the woody2.js > > Yup. You've confirmed what I suspected. What I was (indirectly) > getting at, is that binding to a source goes a little further than > binding to DOM or bean, but remains very generic, and would be > delighted to see it in woody2.js. > > If/when I get to doing my modifiable XMLDBSource, I'll try adding this > to woody2.js, unless you beat me to it!
IIUC you can pretty much copy what's in loadDocument and saveDocument of binding_example.js These are already generic to any (modifiable) source. Guido
