4. The switching of binding to XML or beans costs to much effort. Binding file, JXTemplate (for the result), flow script. Maybe I did something the wrong way, but the XML needs at least a root element, why this would be annoying for the bean. Some ideas for that?
hm, both are supported, but that doesn't necesarrily mean that swapping between both is that easy.
I encountered the same when doing the first of my binding-samples... I ended up switching easily by not passing the DOM directly into the binding, but rather the root-node. Note: when binding to XML you need to pass in a DOM Node, not a DOM Document!
Sometimes it's soo simple. But could it be that it is a one-way ticket?
nope works both ways for me, of course I write back to the same document I read fromm
Saving the "document" back does not work, because document is null.
howcome?
Good question. I simply used the woody2.js and the loadDocument() and saveDocument() from binding.js. Hmm, I will look again.
Joerg
