Sylvain Wallez wrote: > > I'm asking because I several times encountered the need for some very > small app-specific code to be called as part of a pipeline that > otherwise don't need all the bells and whistles of a flowscript call, > and I'm still thinking a flow-action may be a very usefull addition, > i.e. an action that allows to call a flowscript function (and access the > global scope) but doesn't require to end with a sendPage or > sendPageAndWait. > +1, I was thinking about the same, so go ahead :)
Carsten
