Sylvain Wallez wrote: <snip>
I made no answer to your recent addition to Woody because of lack of time, but will do it very soon (it contains very interesting stuff).
Ok. No pressure.
I do think, however, that the flowscript integration should just be an /integration/ and not an extension. By this, I mean there should be no Woody features only available in flowscript except those that are intimately flowscript related such as form redisplay using continuations.Of course it's open to debate, but it seems to me that if you are using flowscript then that is also the best place to put the action, on-change, and validation callbacks. If you're not using flowscript then what are you using (actions?). You can write your own FormHandler to handle action, on-change, and validation in your action. I don't think we should duplicate that functionality in the form definition (in terms of JS snippets and repeater-action) simply because it may be inconvenient to do it in an action.
Sylvain
Chris
