Does that answer mean you think a XIndice persistent store implementation would be a good fit? As you're involved heavily in both projects, you'd be the best to comment probably...
It would work. Take a look at the linked class, as well as at Filer interface. What's your opinion?
That's what I think. It would work. The issue in my mind is more to do with performance. Could it compete with jisp? Do you have any thoughts there Vadim?
Hm... A full blown XIndice because we want the persitant store? Do you really think that's a good idea?
Actually, haven't we considered doing this anyway? I have a dim memory of us wanting to put an xml fragment store in the core for some performance miracle...
I'd rather see this part ripped out of XIndice and put into Avalon and share it that way instead of using XIndice.
Sounds like Vadim already suggested a separate jar...
Geoff
