Reinhard Poetz dijo: > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Stefano Mazzocchi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Sent: Friday, February 20, 2004 3:55 PM >> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Subject: Re: Jisp 3.0 moved to GPL licence >> >> >> Steven Noels wrote: >> >> > On 20 Feb 2004, at 12:52, Torsten Curdt wrote: >> > >> >> hm... what do they do? >> >> maybe we should talk to them and coordinate efforts? >> > >> > >> > +1 - seems like the best plan to go forward without over-reacting. >> > >> > FWIW: I think we should actively weed out one-man-effort >> dependencies. >> > People have the freedom to change their mind, but we shouldn't be a >> > victim of that. >> >> +1000 >> >> But keep in mind that we are never locked in as we always >> have the right >> to fork. So, let's keep reasonable and not panic. > > +1 > As Antonio already said it's no emergency becaue we *do use* a former > version under a 'friendly' licency and we have time to evaluate all > possible options without getting panic. For now this is > > - forking Jisp 2.6 > - JCS > - OSCache from Opensymphonie > > Some mentioned RDBMS systems or XMLDBs - of course an option but I don't > think they are designed for our caching needs (but maybe I'm wrong > here).
I will prefer to eat our own "dog food". I think Apache JCS is a good candidate. If there are bugs, let fix them! Please keep in mind that excalibur need to be changed too. Best Regards, Antonio Gallardo
