Antonio Gallardo wrote: > > Hi: > > I think a cache storage system is IMHO a very good idea. A > piece of history: > > 1- Initial idea of using jisp: > http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=xml-cocoon-dev&m=100781998632619&w=2 > > 2-is this is still valid?: "B-Tree indexed file vs filesystem > directory" > http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=xml-cocoon-dev&m=100816638410528&w=2 > > 3-"The jisp store is definitely better..." > http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=xml-cocoon-dev&m=101120120825438&w=2 > > Well, I think all the pointed mails + others in the devel > maillist clearly stated that it is better have a database in > the storage than any filesystem. Did we need to retest it again? > > So I will be glad if people here seriously consider Apache > JCS. It is used in many other Apache projects it is from our > own workshop and it can work with jisp too. > > WDYT? > Exactly, we already tried out a store that simply used the filesystem (with converting a key to several directories). This Filesystem store is still available somewhere and could be used. BUT there were several problems (keys to long on windows, performance) etc. and I think we shouldn't reivent the wheel (otherwise we could also write our own xml parser etc.).
JCS seems to be a perfect candidate, so why not using it/trying it out? Carsten
