DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27176>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27176 [PATCH] optional removal of XSP-introduced extra whitespace ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-02-24 09:01 ------- > Another note: if it is like XSLT why not using the same syntax? Many of the > XSP elements follow the XSLT syntax. Well, I tried my best to do just that, I looked in http://www.w3.org/TR/xslt#strip and picked @xml:space which matched best with what I had coded. @xml:space can only take two values "preserve" or "default", so I had to find a more meaningful value as stripping could not be the default in XSPs for compatibility reasons, hence "strip" (which is coherent with "xsl:strip-space" and "xsl:preserve-space"). I also just did not want to use the xml namespace as I confusely felt I had no right to do so! ;-) About XSP elements I already wrote something about <xsp:text/> compared to <xsl:text/>. If you refer to <xsl:strip-space/> and <xsl:preserve-space/>, these provide more fine-grained functionality that what is in this patch, so I thought be better to leave <xsp:strip-space/> and <xsp:preserve-space/> to the one(s) who would implement something as tuneable...
