Jorg Heymans wrote: > > I agree with this for core blocks. > > Will there be a different central repository then for the > more exotic blocks that don't offer core functionality? Your > community rule might hold people back from creating blocks > for the fun of it. > Example: i've been thinking about creating a text-to-speech > block just for the learning experience. Unlikely that more > than 3 committers need this, so where will it end up if i > want to donate it? > > There was a discussion a few months ago about the need for a > blocks.cocoondev.org alike site, maybe this is relevant again > now? By default you would allow all blocks into an incubation > phase and do a vote on the ones to absorb in the cocoon dist. > Each block is more or a less a separate (sub) project. So there definitly needs to be a community around it before it should end up in our CVS. We failed at this point in the past. Take a look at some blocks we have, there are quiet a lot that don't have a community. So we should start considering this point with new contributions and I think Bertrands proposal is simple but good enough.
Carsten
