Marc Portier wrote:
Reinhard P�tz wrote:
Vadim Gritsenko wrote:
Reinhard P�tz wrote:
Tim Larson wrote:
+1 'cforms' instead of just 'forms'
I'm +1 for "forms" only - as Vadim pointed out, it's "Cocoon" is
obvious because it's within the Cocoon CVS.
WDOT?
Ok, we (where we stands for Vadim, Tim, Bertrand, and Rolf) had a
little chat on IRC and agreed on the following:
Block Title: Cocoon Forms, or Cocoon Forms 1.0
Block Name: cforms
Package: org.apache.cocoon.cforms
Namespace: http://apache.org/cocoon/forms/definition/1.0
sorry for missing the argumentation on keeping the 'forms' here, or is
this a typo?
NS Prefix: fd
and similar for binding and templating I presume? we might question if
reordering the sub-domain and version-no is not more natural then:
xmlns:fd=http://apache.org/cocoon/cforms/1.0/definition
xmlns:fb=http://apache.org/cocoon/cforms/1.0/binding
I like it, but I'm no specialist on those things.
Stefano, IIRC you did some research on namespaces for Cocoon Blocks, WDYT?
--
Reinhard
