Unico Hommes wrote: > > Carsten Ziegeler wrote: > > >Unico Hommes wrote: > > > > > > > >>I am just thinking whether it'd be worth a separate > protocol something > >>like forward://something ? > >> > >> > >> > >Yes, I thought of this as well. Unfortunately we have to > many hardcoded > >places, where against the protocol name "cocoon:" is tested. > So if we > >provide a new protocol we have to change all those places as well. > > > >And we have to come up with a good name, as <map:generate > >src="forward://something"/> might look at little bit strange :) > > > > > > O I thought you meant by forward the behavior that error > handling would > be forwarded to the called pipeline and that the default > behavior should > be that errors are handled by the calling pipeline. Yes, I meant that :) I think the word "forward" is good for a redirect (map:redirect-to uri="forward://sggd" but not for a general source definition (map:generate src="forward://")
> In that > case it may > be a lot less places where it had to change? Why? Perhaps we meant the same? > What should be the default behavior? > The default should be as it is now. Carsten
