Tim Larson wrote:

On Tue, Mar 09, 2004 at 04:21:09PM +0100, Reinhard P?tz wrote:


As you may saw I've reverted the removal of Woody. IMO just for now and it should be removed ASAP. So let's vote on this:

variant A: remove Woody after 2.1.5 release

variant B: remove Woody after 2.1.6 release

variant C: leave Woody where it is and mark it as "won't change"


Your votes please!



+1 to freeze the Woody directory via permissions or CVS right now. +1 to keep it at least for the 2.1.5 release. +1 to query the users ml after the 2.1.5 release to see if there is any reason to keep it for one more release (2.1.6).

We have to remember that even though we state that Woody is alpha,
there is a pretty large installed userbase already. We have to be
nice to them to keep them with us during transitions like this.



I totally second that: +1 to freeze, +1 to keep in 2.1.5, +1 to poll users after 2.1.5.

And thanks a lot (again), Reinhard for this work.

Sylvain

--
Sylvain Wallez                                  Anyware Technologies
http://www.apache.org/~sylvain           http://www.anyware-tech.com
{ XML, Java, Cocoon, OpenSource }*{ Training, Consulting, Projects }



Reply via email to