Am Mi, den 10.03.2004 schrieb Unico Hommes um 19:24: > There remain a few issues that need resolving. > > - InputModuleAction had to move along with xsp because it has a > dependency on some xsp helper class. This is unfortunate and maybe > unnecessary. Perhaps someone with more knowledge about this class could > take a look and see if they can solve this? > > - Source samples. Some use xsp's. Move these to xsp block or remove them > altogether?
I'm in favour of removing them. But I can't decide that. > - I18n samples. Needs volunteer. > > - simpleform samples. Needs volunteer. Only the first example use XSPs. > - session-fw patches are executed before xsp patches but depend on them. > Move xsp specific stuff from session-fw to xsp. I think this stuff, can stay where it is. The patch mechanism should now work properly. > - some blocks have dependencies on xsp. These need to be declared. I think the rest comes the paradigm shift to flow+jx early or later. Stephan.
