Sylvain Wallez wrote: > > >Hi, > > > >to avoid double efforts in the same area, I just wanted to > inform you that I will try to write a new tree processor for > 2.2 in the next few days. > > > >Why? There are several reasons: > >- Reverting to ECM in 2.2 requires some changes to the tree > processor > >used in 2.1.x anyway > > > > > > Curious : are these changes those related to the changes on > Environment, or are there more? > Not only, we removed some of the deprecated component stuff in 2.2 (excalibur component selector etc.)
> >- Implementing Virtual Sitemap Components > >- Implementing Inheritance of Views > > > > > > I do have some ideas about this and am willing to > participate. Where do we start? > Here on my PC :) Now, seriously, I already started implementing the virtual sitemap components (according to the discussions months ago) some weeks ago, but failed due to the problems with Fortress :( I'm currently trying to get a first version up and running by wednesday (hopefully). Then I will commit the changes and we can continue developing here (= our CVS). > >- Being Container Independent > > > > > > Is it really possible? There needs to be some dependency on > the container somehow to create and fill it, no? > Sure, but I hope to fit everthing into a single class which should make moving to another container much easier (just replace this one class, and that's it). That's currently not possible. > >- Adding a profiling/debugging api > > > > > > Cool. It would be good for this API not to be limited to the > sitemap only, but also be able to include other components > such as JXTemplate, XSP, CForms, etc. > Yes, exactly - I won't do much in this area, but will try to make it easier to plug something into the sitemap processor as the first step. > >So, apart from reverting to ECM, I will start to implement > some of the new features we planned for 2.2. Please note that > we haven't discussed all points from above in detail but I > think it's easier to discuss on an implementation base > instead of duing endless discussions. > > > >I will try to reuse as much as possible from both tree > processors (2.1 and 2.2). And I hope to come up with a > working solution by the end of next week. > > > > > > With all features? That's quick! > :) - Ehm,...,hmm....hmmmm....ok, perhaps not with all features, but some of them :) More soon. Carsten
