Joerg Heinicke wrote:
On 29.03.2004 16:06, Marc Portier wrote:
Hi all,
I recetly experienced the need for a nice and clean introduction of a custom binding class for the cforms.
The idea would be to have an all Java alternative to the flexibility one gets from the <fb:javascript> binding.
Currently I see two ways of operating this:
1/ Custom Binding Class
2/ Custom Binding Builder
But isn't this just about moving the conf from cocoon.xconf to binding file (what I would not like for SoC reasons)?
hm, for the @builder case you have a point
but the @class case behaves different IMHO, and like Sylvain points out releaves the pain of needing to write a builder
hm, if SoC is the argument, then shouldn't we consider the who is doing what discussion?
my feeling is that touching the xconf is out of question to a lot of users? They could easily write up a custom-binding and be glad they never need to learn about the xconf in the first place?
-marc= -- Marc Portier http://outerthought.org/ Outerthought - Open Source, Java & XML Competence Support Center Read my weblog at http://blogs.cocoondev.org/mpo/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
