Re: Kernel...

[Pier Fumagalli]

On 31 Mar 2004, at 12:21, Carsten Ziegeler wrote:

I would say: yes, add the blocks directory. It would be good if the blocks
you add there are not already used in the cocoon-2.1 cvs, which means just
use unused names.

Given that any block follows a naming such as http://host/name/version, I would think that to avoid complications, we could represent that structure in CVS:

/src
  /blocks
    /cocoon.apache.org
      /block_name
    /jakarta.apache.org (???)
      /block_name
    /www.orixo.com (???)
      /block_name

And versions are ignored as CVS already provides versioning.

Or would "our" block only be http://cocoon.apache.org/ even if we "wrap" stuff from other people? (I'm thinking about Jakarta Commons DBCP and POOL right now, maybe more stuff in the future)

Pier

Carsten

-----Original Message-----
From: Pier Fumagalli [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 31, 2004 12:35 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Kernel...

The kernel is now all in CVS (it's still sucky, but I'm still
working on it, at least now it compiles and - seems - to run nicely).

I have a few blocks that I want to develop around it (generic
stuff, JDBC connection pool, poolable factories and event
handling). I've noticed that in the Cocoon 2.2 tree there is
no "/src/blocks" directory structure, can I put them in there?

Pier

smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature