Antonio Gallardo wrote:
Gianugo Rabellino dijo:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
FYI:
http://www.theserverside.com/articles/article.tss?l=Cocoon
Gosh. Action + XSP in march 2004. :-(
Not sure in what world we live... ROTFL! :-D
ROTFL? Not that much, since TSS has a lot of exposure, and people will miss a lot of the nice features we all use for a long time now (cforms, flowscript, jxtemplate), and the article therefore totally misses the point of "Cocoon as a web framework".
well, people, look at the good side of it: at least they are not talking about us as an XSLT servlet anymore.
Our documentation does *NOT* reflect the change in paradigm that this community underwent in the past 12/18 months and a wiki is not exactly the place where you look for official information to write an article.
There is nothing to laugh about, I agree, but there is nothing to worry about either.
And, besides, remember the say: any exposure is good exposure.
Now, we should focus on returning our documentation to show what we think it's good and what we think it was a bad idea.
-- Stefano.
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
