On Thu, Apr 01, 2004 at 12:13:05AM +0200, Joerg Heinicke wrote: > On 25.03.2004 04:02, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > >>It was added so that the value of a field could be validated before being > >>used > >>to select a case for a "union" widget. <snip/> > >Ok, just a proposal, don't know if you can live with it: If there is a > >refactoring still to be done and the validation is only "good" not > >necessary, > >what about removing this stuff (at least additional getValue()) for now. > >This > >will make all other fields behave normally again while it seems not to > >break the > >new widgets (which are furthermore not that common in use I guess). > > > >WDYT? > > Tim? Any response?
Sorry for the delay. I will work on a solution tomorrow (Thursday), and get back to you with the results for you to check. --Tim Larson
