Upayavira wrote:
Joerg Heinicke wrote:
<snip />
So now the vote:
[ ] exclude.block.blockname=true|false [+1] include.block.blockname=true|false
is my vote too...
JoergExclude always seemed really odd to a native English speaker. It was always the wrong way around.
Upayavira
well, imagine trying to figure it out if you're not a native English speaker :-)
in any case: this will be rather bath news for people that have adopted to this scheme: http://wiki.cocoondev.org/Wiki.jsp?page=YourCocoonBasedProjectAnt16
just because they want an easy swap from 2.1.x to current cvs-head and back if needed...
have to think about a flexible way out for those, hints and tips welcome...
only thing I can figure now is for those people to have both exclude.** and include.** props in their local.build.properties so they get the same kind of build result
regards, -marc= -- Marc Portier http://outerthought.org/ Outerthought - Open Source, Java & XML Competence Support Center Read my weblog at http://blogs.cocoondev.org/mpo/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
