Joerg Heinicke dijo: > Another important difference at least for XUL is it's templating > mechanism. Supply the data as RDF and the XUL page builds up the form > itself. This would replace forms-samples-styling.xsl & co. But it would > not make CForms superfluous. I even see no request/response cycles are > saved.
Some cycles can be saved in the similar way as they are saved by DHTML. Example: suppose you have a textbox widget as required. XUL can also check it before post back to the server. Best Regards, Antonio Gallardo
