Am Di, den 13.04.2004 schrieb Rolf Kulemann um 20:21:
> On Tue, 2004-04-13 at 19:50, Stephan Michels wrote:
> > ...
> > My proposal is to drop the Slide Source, but leave the Slide server as
> > option, and using the Slide block in the same sense as the hsqldb block.
> > So that we can use Slide as WebDAV server for our WebDAV examples.
> > 
> 
> Does drop mean to remove the source? Would that cause compatibility
> problems? 

The Slide block is already marked as unstable.

> Or decreases flexibility in accessing Slide?

I don't think that you decreases the flexibility, but you will using
the _standard_ way to access the respository. 

> However, I would be fine with removing the Slide source and use a
> WebdavSource or such instead.

Yes, we should focus on one way and do it right.

And honestly, I think that WebDAV will be the standard, similar to SOAP.
The API, which will sit ontop of WebDAV, is secondary, IMHO.


Stephan.

Reply via email to