I do hope someone can look at this and tell me where I'm wrong. Bye, Helma
-----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, 15 April 2004 23:31 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Jexl and JXPath give different results! Hi, I've been fiddling around with retrieving info from a custom built object. For clarity I'll explain the object here: Class Person { private Hashtable cocoonTraits; private String ID; .... public String getID() { return ID; } public Map getTraits() { return cocoonTraits; } } Class CocoonTrait { private Hashtable cocoonTraits; private Hashtable cocoonValues; private String name; .... public String getName() { return name; } public Map getTraits() { return cocoonTraits; } public Map getValues() { return cocoonValues; } } Class CocoonValue { private String name; private Object value; .... public String getName() { return name; } public Object getValue() { return value; } } I've instantiated the above and added some values to the CocoonValue objects. Then I want to display them: <jx:template xmlns:jx="http://apache.org/cocoon/templates/jx/1.0"> <html> <head><title>A person</title></head> <body> <p>A person = ${person.ID} </p> <table border="1"> <jx:forEach var="trait" select="${person.traits}"> <tr><td colspan="2">Trait = ${trait.name}</td></tr> <jx:forEach var="value" select="${trait.values}"> <tr> <td>${value.name}</td><td>${value.value}</td> </tr> </jx:forEach> </jx:forEach> </table> <table border="1"> <jx:forEach select="#{person/traits}"> <tr> <td colspan="2">#{./name}</td> </tr> <jx:forEach select="#{values}"> <tr> <td>#{./name}</td><td>#{./value}</td> </tr> </jx:forEach> </jx:forEach> </table> </body> </html> </jx:template> The first table correctly shows all Trait names and all Value names and the values of those that are filled in. The second table only shows: <table border="1"> <tr> <td colspan="2">[EMAIL PROTECTED]</td> </tr> </table> So either I've done something wrong in the syntax (which I cannot conclude from the docs}, or there is something really wrong. Bye, Helma
