Tim Olson wrote:
Yes, we habe FOM. The difference to the sitemap is that the sitemap enforces the contract while flow doesn't.

One drastic approach would be to stop flow from being able to access java at all, if not thru FOM. I would be in favor of that once we have the real block system running, but at that point it might well be too late.


we already have a nice system of flow helper methods to access entity beans
and pump them into XML.  we use flow to select which components are needed
when, and the contract with our GUI designers is XML.  we were already burnt
quite badly when sendPage() became a requirement, since we were using flow
to merely select actions and the sitemap had all of our branching.  we are
now unable to upgrade past 2.1.2 without major refactoring which honestly we
can't afford to do.
you theoreticians seem all too willing to break production systems to
enforce your latest notion of best practices.

Tim, don't take the word for everything said in a RT thread and don't worry that access to Java will be disabled in the 2.x branch (if ever) as this certainly would break any production system running on with flow.


Guido

--
Guido Casper
-------------------------------------------------
S&N AG, Competence Center Open Source
                    Tel.: +49-5251-1581-87
Klingenderstr. 5    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
D-33100 Paderborn   http://www.s-und-n.de
-------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to