Ugo Cei wrote:
Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
Should we interpret this as a veto?
It's not up to interpretation, as nobody can veto [VOTE]s.
Vetos can only be used to revert commits that should not happen because of problems they generate, and be accompanied with solid technical reasons.
Thank you for the clarification. I did look around for an exhaustive and unambiguous description of our voting procedures, but couldn't find any. Do you have any pointers?
http://incubator.apache.org/learn/voting.html
Hmmm...
"Under normal (non-lazy consensus) conditions, the proposal requires three positive votes and no negative ones in order to pass; [...]
For code-modification votes, +1 votes are in favour of the proposal, but -1 votes are vetos and kill the proposal dead until all vetoers withdraw their -1 votes."
Doesn't this apply to this vote?
Ugo
