Marc Portier wrote: > > Carsten Ziegeler wrote: > > > compatibility. But as Cocoon is distributed as a source > release that > > you have to compile anyway, it's saver to compile your own > application > > code (if > > 2 thoughts: > > - I think this has more to do with the nature of Java, then > how we release stuf (i.e. there is no real distinction > between compiling versus source or class files AFAICS, that > is why we cannot make the distinction the apr blokes are > making between source and binary compat, no?) > > - I would like us to make binaries again somewhere soon. > Apart from the outcome of that discussion I find it odd to > use the way we distribute as an argument for anything > mentioned here, no? > I guess as soon as we have real blocks we can switch to binary releases again if we want. But the reasons for recompiling are of course still valid. > > and one more suggestion after reading it all > > (to be added at the end) > > Reality > ------- > <SNIP>
Nice one! I added it at the end. Thanks Carsten
