Yes, this change is backward compatible with 2.1.4, but not with the version Carsten checked in last week. I'd appreciate a vote to have this patch applied.
Ralph -----Original Message----- From: Joerg Heinicke [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, May 09, 2004 1:52 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: LogKitLoggerManager On 09.05.2004 19:25, Ralph Goers wrote: > I've submitted patch 28860. I realize this is after the code freeze, but I'd > prefer to see this patch instead of the current code. If 2.1.5 goes out with > the current code we would have to maintain the current behavior of > logger-type. I guess it's completely backwards compatible (same default behaviour and so on). Then it can go in, but we must vote about it. It's best if you start the vote yourself. But IMO we should not wait 72 h for that vote as we would have only Thursday to test it. 36 h are enough for this case IMO. Joerg
