Considering all our version discussions, we want the next Cocoon version to be a minor version change, so this will be 2.2. We will put new features into it that were planned for 2.2 anyway, perhaps except blocks.
Pier suggested that we follow the Linux versioning, so the version numbers .0, .2, etc. mark stable versions whereas .1,.3 etc. mark developer versions. If we want to follow this, we should imho skip 2.2, use 2.3 to indicate a developer version and 2.4 will then be the final and stable version.
WDYT?
I like it ... Though I'd like to see 2.2.0 with the stable form API, and move what's currently in 2.2 in 2.3... :-)
Pier
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
