Ugo Cei dijo: > Ugo Cei wrote: >> Carsten Ziegeler wrote: >> >>> Now, the big question: does this work with EHCache? >> The documentation seems to imply that serializability is necessary only >> for objects spooled to disk, but from looking at the source, I was > > I've checked and unfortunately, you can only add a > net.sf.ehcache.Element to a cache, and all the constructors for Element > take a Serializable as the type for the "value" parameter, so we're out > of luck unless we modify EHCache (shouldn't be too much work, but we > should ask the EHCache developers before doing a fork).
yet another fork? How many forks we will have for Cocoon: Rhino Jisp (evaluated as a solution at a time). Now ehcache? It is going to be very hard to mantain.... I think it is a bad idea. Best Regards, Antonio Gallardo
