Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:

I agree that making Cocoon more "dreamweaver"-friendly would give us lots of new friends.


and I don't see why we can't do it right now: all we need is a pipeline component that is capable of understanding a tapestry-like, dreamweaver-friendly syntactic addition to HTML (thru attributes, comments or whatever else).

This component can "augment" the page in a more XML-ish way and from that point on you can still do whatever you want with cocoon, including further site-wide XSLT (could be *very* useful for HTML cleanup and normalization), xinclusion or just serialization if your generated content is good enough (I do that most of the time).

In short, I don't see an architectural problem, just a matter of scratching your itch if you have one ;-)


Hmm, opening my copy of DWMX, there's an absolute *ton* of stuff that could be done. There's a bunch of API reference stuff in the Help. There are APIs for: File I/O, HTTP, Database integration, JavaBeans, and Source Control Integration.


There's a bunch of documentation for data sources, which would probably allow us to setup some sort of CForms binding with some hacking.

Also taking a quick glance, there's a bunch of GUI stuff, which would probably allow us to graphically build forms.

Like you said, Stefano, it's all possible, it's just a matter of someone taking the time to get really deeply into it an figure out how to do it.

Tony



Reply via email to