Pier Fumagalli wrote: > > On 26 May 2004, at 10:17, Carsten Ziegeler wrote: > > > > Some things that come to my mind for 2.2: > > - first finished version of CForms. > > - deprecate XSP (and provide a viable alternative) > > - cleaning up the caching/store mess > > - remove deprecated blocks etc. > > I like it, I like it! :-) (yep, twice). > > Starting on 2.2 to bring the current 2.1 to a level of > complete solidity of contracts and features is, IMVHO, an > optimal idea, and puts us in the position (also) to start > using the Linux-like versioning scheme. Yupp!
> > 2.2 will be our "stable" tree, and all crummy development > (real blocks, and you name it) can easily happen in 2.3 which > will always be kept as "unstable", to end up with a 2.4 release! :-P > Yepp ! > Now, the only thing I'm horrified about is that voice about a > BRANCH in our current CVS (aaarrrrggggghhhh)... I'd say we > clear out the 2.2 CVS repo and do a clean re-import of 2.1.5, > or switch to Subversion now, but purlllease don't add any > branch in the tree... > Yes, I think we should wait for the switch (next monday I think it was) and then continue. > If someone wants, I can rename the 2.2 repository into a 2.3 > straight away (so that we ain't going to lose anything)... > We should just properly import it into svn. Carsten
