Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
Sylvain Wallez wrote:
Honestly, I don't see the need for such a change now that the logger type can be chosen in web.xml.This is a big concern for users, they simply want to use log4j.
Ok. So our experiences differ on that point.
Also, long ago, I compared the code of LogKit and Log4J and found constructs in Log4J that made it intrinsically much more slower than LogKit just to check is a log level is enabled. It would be good to do a performance comparison with the latest versions, as we have so manyOk, that's a good point. Now log4j always claims to be the fastest
getLogger().isDebugEnabled() around...
logging system, so I guess this isn't an issue anymore.
Well, they claimed it at that time also. Log4J has some very good marketing ;-)
Sylvain
-- Sylvain Wallez Anyware Technologies http://www.apache.org/~sylvain http://www.anyware-tech.com { XML, Java, Cocoon, OpenSource }*{ Training, Consulting, Projects }