Antonio Gallardo wrote: > > lol. Just yesterday we had a little discussion about that in > the office. > We wonder why nobody commented about XSP deprecation! :-D
Yepp, I did the same. Perhaps it's because most people only read the first two or three senctences of an email? :) > > We have 2 application running XSP. Good luck! > > I think what Carsten thought is to let the XSP block live > alone. No dependencies to it at all. Currently, there are > many blocks requiring XSP just for samples and that is not > good. Also you end up including the block even when the > overall application don't use XSP at all. As a sample there > is auth-fw and the session-fw. > > I am +1 to start "cleaning XSP" from the other blocks. > Yes, thanks, Antonio, this is imho an important point. Carsten
