Nicola Ken Barozzi dijo: > Antonio Gallardo wrote: > ... >> Yep, but keep in mind that we are not talking about rhino here. We are >> talking about more files: >> >> lib/core: >> commons-jexl-1.0-beta-1-20040113.jar -> currently 116 kB >> commons-jxpath-20030909.jar -> 266 kB >> jcs-1.0-dev-20040516.jar -> 318 kB >> rhino1.5r4-continuations-20040627.jar -> before was 500 kB > ...etc > > I did not think it was about *these* snapshots too. I thought it was > about snapshots of stuff that we had modified somehow and the code of > which was hard to find or build. (see for example excalibur stuff when > there was confusion about it's future).
Yep. It was: <quoting> Some time ago, we discussed the need to keep sources somewhere in Cocoon for third-party jars produced from CVS snapshots.... </quoting> Source: http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=xml-cocoon-dev&m=108841157302296&w=2 AFAIK, the term "3rd party" refers to anything outside cocoon. That includes other Apache projects. The posted list is valid. Best Regards, Antonio Gallardo > If what Antonio has written is the case, consider my vote a -1, as we > should not be distributing sources of things that can and should be > easily gotten elsewhere, *especially* is 'elsewhere' is still in Apache. > > -- > Nicola Ken Barozzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] > - verba volant, scripta manent - > (discussions get forgotten, just code remains) > --------------------------------------------------------------------- >
