Steven Noels said: > On 30 Jun 2004, at 08:47, Sylvain Wallez wrote: > > > CVS sandbox size shouldn't be a concern IMHO - distribution size might > be for some, and would hopefully get solved once we split Cocoon into a > kernel project and a federation of Cocoon modules|blocks subprojects. > Until we are there, we might add an �ber-src-jar build target to the > build system collecting source dumps of those libraries and wrapping > those into a cocoon-unreleased-dependent-libs.jar we ship along the > real distribution. > > Since Ralph is very keen on this, maybe he can help to come up with > some Ant tasks. ;-) > > </Steven> <sigh> We need to move to a different planet with more hours in the day. Actually, if I was to work on this I'm not sure you'd like what I'd come up with. It would probably be based on Maven since that is what we use for our project.
- Re: Cocoon is not gump! Vadim Gritsenko
- Re: Cocoon is not gump! Ralph Goers
- Re: Cocoon is not gump! Vadim Gritsenko
- Cocoon is not maven! (was Coco... Ralph Goers
- Re: Cocoon is not maven! (was ... Stefano Mazzocchi
- Re: Cocoon is not gump! Stefano Mazzocchi
- Re: Cocoon is not gump! Steven Noels
- Re: Cocoon is not gump! Sylvain Wallez
- Re: Cocoon is not gump! Steven Noels
- Re: Cocoon is not gump! David Crossley
- Re: Cocoon is not gump! Ralph Goers
- Re: Cocoon is not gump! Antonio Gallardo
- RE: [VOTE] preservation policy for thir... Carsten Ziegeler
- RE: [VOTE] preservation policy for... Ralph Goers
- RE: [VOTE] preservation policy... David Crossley
- Re: [VOTE] preservation policy for third-party snapshot ... Vadim Gritsenko
- Re: [VOTE] preservation policy for third-party snapshot ... Ralph Goers
- Re: [VOTE] preservation policy for third-party snap... Antonio Gallardo
- Re: [VOTE] preservation policy for third-party snapshot ... Bruno Dumon
- Re: [VOTE] preservation policy for third-party snap... David Crossley
