Torsten Curdt wrote:
Folks,
please noone take this personal (reinhard,
please don't)
no problem. I'm always interested in other opinions.
but am I the only one that thinks that this use of bugzilla is kinda awkward?
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25114
Having the Cocoon Forms "overview" in bugzilla to gather the dependency list is perfect IMHO. Definitely a good idea! But the above entry is just a reference to some documentation ...and it was entered as such. Do we wanna have such stuff in bugzilla?
after Betrand's great presentation at the GetTogether last year we agreed that we try Bugzilla. At this time we had a list in our Wiki of all requirements which are prerequisits for a stable CocoonForms block and many people thought that this wasn't the best way.
IMHO That's not the right place because
we could end up with a huge amount of bugs
just pointing to documentation. ...at least
let's mark such stuff as "WON'T FIX" or
something.
Unfortunatly each entry is called "bug" but some are necessary points for our Roadmap. We just use Bugzilla to manage our Roadmap. I know it is far from being complete (e.g. Portal Engine, Blocks implementation are missing) and we as community don't use it in the way Bertrand suggested but it has been a first step.
If this discussion doesn't lead to "we don't need it or don't want it this way" I will move all our roadmap entries into Bugzilla and will try keep them more up-to-date.
-- Reinhard
