Sylvain Wallez wrote: > > > Well, it would have been easy for us to allow it, simply by > defining builtin default values for <map:pipes>. I can't > remember of any other needed modifications. > We removed/deprecated a redirect to resources I think as well.
> <SNIP> > > Okay. So we should decide on how the versioning is to be > defined. Should it be a new namespace URI or an @version > attribute as in XSL? > > I like @version more, but the namespace URI already contains > a version number... > I always thought that is what namespaces (containing a version number) are for. I'm not an expert but I think checking the sitemap for validity using different namespaces is easer than using a version attribute. So this in combination with the fact that we already have the version number in the namespace: +1 for namespaces :) > > > >Great! So we have the behaviour back we had with our XSLT sitemap > >implementation :) > > > > > > XSLT? Do you mean the compiled sitemap engine or Unico's > version that flattens the tree? > The compiled one (using XSLT to transform the sitemap into Java). But in fact it's not that important. > > Ok. So I'll continue that way, which means removing your > configuration > merging stuff in favor of separate config files. Note that > the size of > these files has been largely reduced since they no more contain role > definitions. > Go ahead. Carsten
