On 18.07.2004 09:06, Colin Paul Adams wrote:
"Ralph" == Ralph Goers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Colin> So, shall I raise a bug then? Ralph> I certainly would.
OK.
But before I do, I'd better be certain which version from CVS I'm running.
I checked out anonymously a few weeks ago. I thought it was cocoon 2.1 then (but I'm not certain).
But these days, when I do a build, the build directory has a cocoon-2.0.0-dev sub-directory.
This is cocoon-2.2.0-dev, isn't it?
Yet CVS/Repository says cocoon-2.1
Yes, that's an irritating naming. We will fix it when moving to SVN.
And Bugzilla offers me both Current CVS 2.1 and Current CVS 2.2
So I think it must be 2.2, but I'm not sure.
Please use 2.1.
Maybe I should check out afresh from scratch. Will that guarentee 2.2?
Don't use cocoon-2.2 repository as it contains "something completely different": it was thought as 2.2, but we decided later to continue development in cocoon-2.1 repository. The 2.2 repository had some refactoring that were hopefully all backported to 2.1 repository and additional a new container. cocoon-2.2 will be only a branch in SVN.
Joerg
