Gianugo Rabellino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > On Tue, 27 Jul 2004 14:57:08 +0200, Daniel Fagerstrom > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > <snip>SWT discussion</snip> > > All in all, I'd rather favor the transformer approach ATM: it > seems to me that it fits much better in the overall Cocoon > architecture: you build your request inside the pipeline, > pass it through a component which performs the POST and grab > the result (something you can, besides, do a using a > cocoon:// src to the WSProxyGenerator). But I'm open to > change my mind. > > Anyone else cares to comment? >
Just to agree that I'd use a transformer approach as well and that if you're ok with flow it might also help: you could use a processPipelineTo call to dynamically go off and grab any XML you want for inclusion in the main pipeline.
