I link to this not because of the fact that the author gives such a bright picture of Spring, but because of this sentence:
"I think it would be unfair to us (Jetspeed developers) to give all the credit to Spring for the ease of transition. We all have done a tremendous job writing well-designed components that are portable and that demonstrate low-coupling along with high re-useability. This just goes to reaffirm that Jetspeed 2 is moving in the right direction in terms of design and architecture. Kudos to us all ;)"
My aim, when proposing Butterfly, is to move towards an architecture that is so loosely coupled and portable that it would be equally easy to port Cocoon from {insert random container here} to {insert different random container here} as it was for the Jetspeed folks.
Ugo
-- Ugo Cei - http://beblogging.com/
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
